首页> 外文OA文献 >Testing differential susceptibility: Plasticity genes, the social environment, and their interplay in adolescent response inhibition
【2h】

Testing differential susceptibility: Plasticity genes, the social environment, and their interplay in adolescent response inhibition

机译:测试差异敏感性:可塑性基因,社会环境及其在青少年反应抑制中的相互作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Impaired inhibitory control is a key feature of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We investigated gene-environment interaction (GxE) as a possible contributing factor to response inhibition variation in context of the differential susceptibility theory. This states individuals carrying plasticity gene variants will be more disadvantaged in negative, but more advantaged in positive environments. METHODS: Behavioural and neural measures of response inhibition were assessed during a Stop-signal task in participants with (N = 197) and without (N = 295) ADHD, from N = 278 families (age M = 17.18, SD =3.65). We examined GxE between candidate plasticity genes (DAT1, 5-HTT, DRD4) and social environments (maternal expressed emotion, peer affiliation). RESULTS: A DRD4 x Positive peer affiliation interaction was found on the right fusiform gyrus (rFG) activation during successful inhibition. Further, 5-HTT short allele carriers showed increased rFG activation during failed inhibitions. Maternal warmth and positive peer affiliation were positively associated with right inferior frontal cortex activation during successful inhibition. Deviant peer affiliation was positively related to the error rate. CONCLUSIONS: While a pattern of differential genetic susceptibility was found, more clarity on the role of the FG during response inhibition is warranted before firm conclusions can be made. Positive and negative social environments were related to inhibitory control. This extends previous research emphasizing adverse environments.
机译:目的:抑制性控制障碍是注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)的关键特征。我们研究了基因-环境相互作用(GxE)作为差异敏感性理论的背景下响应抑制变化的可能的贡献因素。这表明携带可塑性基因变异的个体在阴性条件下将处于更不利的地位,而在阳性环境下将处于更有利的地位。方法:在停止信号任务期间,对来自N = 278个家庭(年龄M = 17.18,SD = 3.65)的有(N = 197)和没有(N = 295)ADHD的参与者进行了反应和神经抑制措施的评估。我们检查了候选可塑性基因(DAT1、5-HTT,DRD4)和社交环境(母亲表达的情感,同伴关系)之间的GxE。结果:在成功抑制过程中,在右梭状回(rFG)激活上发现了DRD4 x积极的同伴关系。此外,5-HTT短等位基因携带者在抑制失败期间显示出更高的rFG激活。在成功抑制过程中,母亲的温暖和同伴的积极联系与右下额叶皮层激活正相关。同伴之间的偏差与错误率呈正相关。结论:尽管发现了遗传易感性差异的模式,但在得出明确结论之前,有必要更加明确FG在抑制反应过程中的作用。积极和消极的社会环境都与抑制控制有关。这扩展了先前的研究,强调了不利的环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号